• MailChimp Widget

    GORDON AND THE WHALE NEWSLETTER



  • Review: PUBLIC ENEMIES

    by:
    July 1st, 2009

    public-enemies-poster

    Rating: 7/10

    Director: Captain Badass who was given the unfitting birth name of Michael Mann
    Writers: Michael Mann, Ronan Bennett, Ann Biderman
    Cast: Johnny Depp, Christian Bale, Billy Crudup, Marion Cotillard
    Studio: Universal

    Michael Mann brings his sleek visual style and his ability to create incredibly realistic and intense action sequences to the 1930s with PUBLIC ENEMIES, focusing on the infamous criminal John Dillinger, whose daring robberies and other crimes made him the most hunted and wanted criminal of the Depression. Mann proves that he still knows how to dazzle with his well-shot gunfights, but struggles when it comes to the human and emotional side of things with PUBLIC ENEMIES, much like his last summer outing, MIAMI VICE. However, while the film doesn't have the depth to stay with you, it is still highly entertaining when the guns start going off, and definitely one of the more exciting movies to come out what has been a disappointing summer movie season so far.

    The film chronicles FBI agent Melvin Purvis' attempts to capture John Dillinger as he robs banks and continues to elude justice, despite being temporarily contained twice before escaping. Purvis and Dillinger, like almost of the PUBLIC ENEMIES' characters, are based on real people, yet they still come across as shallow characterizations, just like many cinematic mobsters and lawmen that we have seen many times before.

    Johnny Depp's Dillinger is cool and calculated, so much so that when we see him finally show emotion and cry after losing his lover Billie Frechette (Marion Cotillard), it's simply not believable; Depp's performance and the screenplay by Mann, Anne Biderand, and Ronan Bennett has not given enough us enough depth to make us believe his reaction. Maybe Dillinger didn't really have much to him, other than a smile/snarl and the tremendous confidence portrayed in PUBLIC ENEMIES. If Depp and Mann's depiction is accurate than perhaps you shouldn't make Dillinger the emotional center of your film, because there is nothing for the audience to relate to or become engaged with.

    Purvis (Christian Bale), is the man who leads the task force to capture Dillinger, and could have been the character that made us become truly invested in the story - a man who has been given a great task and feels the pressure of the entire government on him as J. Edgar Hoover (Billy Crudup) demands results. Unfortunately, there just isn't a lot of screen time devoted to Purvis, and when we do see him he is usually giving or taking orders or waiting outside a building to capture Dillinger. We never get the chance to see Purvis as a person, but only as another cog in the FBI machine, so it's hard to care if he will ever get his man or not.

    The last three paragraphs make it sound like PUBLIC ENEMIES is a bad film, but it's not, it just has problems but it still a lot of fun at times,. As you would expect from a Michael Mann film, PUBLIC ENEMIES' action scenes are very strong. Purvis' attempts to capture Dillinger in a remote cabin becomes one of the most thrilling sequences to appear on screen since the final shootout in Mann's MIAMI VICE; nobody can do a gunfight like Mann, he turns actors firing prop guns at each other into a gritty and visceral art, a big part of the reason why Mann is arguably the best action director working in Hollywood today.

    Another area where Mann continues to excel with PUBLIC ENEMIES is in the visual department, as he gives us striking images, as he continues to make great use of the digital HD that he shot the the film with. The digital HD also allows Mann to give the film a realistic feel that wouldn't be possible with traditional film.

    Yeah, PUBLIC ENEMIES is a film that just operates on the surface, but given that its surface is so much fun to look at, PUBLIC ENEMIES is usually entertaining, if not emotionally engrossing.

    Commenting Rules: Comments are intended to open up the discussion to our readers about the topics at hand, and as such should be offered with a positive and constructive attitude. If your comment is not relative to the above post or is disrespectful to the authors and readers, we reserve the right to delete it. Continued abuse of our good nature will result in banishment of the offender. Additionally, if you have any burning issues to point out to the GATW crew - typos, corrections, suggestions, or straight-up criticism - please email us instead of commenting here.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/KateErbland KateErbland

      Damn fine review, Rusty.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Garage_Sail Garage_Sail

      This morning I came pretty close to reading your review, but I decided against it. Instead, I scanned down to the bottom to get your closing statement and I took your score into consideration before I ventured forth to see it for myself.

      Spoilers in the rest of my post.

      I think that was one of the worst movies to come out in awhile, I'd actually lump it together with Transformers 2 quality.

      First off, there is not a single likable character in this movie. Depp's portrayal of Dillinger is okay but nothing more. The script pays no attention to backstory for any character, any character development, and never really gives the audience a reason to give two shits about any of them.

      At the end of the film you're given a couple of lines for prologue, and you find out that Bale's character kills himself, which to me comes way out of left field because the film barely even hints that this man has his demons (or that the story itself is was led to it).

      Plus, the movie was shot terribly. One minute it looked like your standard movie, next a BBC movie, then a home video, back to standard definition. The camera work itself was inconsistently shakey and then steady back to shakey.

      Good grief. Pretty accurate review but I am surprised to see such a high score.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madefresh madefresh

      I have to agree with the previous post. I didn't like this movie at all. Yes there was character and story issues but it was really the bad camera work and shitty sound design that drove me crazy. Overall really disappointed with this film and I was looking forward to it for so long :(

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/ladyfingers ladyfingers

      I think that there is so much information in this movie that it could have actually been made into a good trilogy. There should have been more development of both Dillinger and Purvis. Also the relationship between Dillinger and the girl could have been developed significantly. There is a scene where the common folk are applauding Dillinger as he is being wisked away in custody, however Mann never lets the audience know why the general public is so enthralled with him. What about Dillinger's relationship with his father, that could have been fleshed out.

      All in all I think this film suffered from a lack likable characters and also a lack of hateable characters. It just kind of happened.

      I did however like the constant shift between HD filming and handheld amateur looking film techniques during the intense scenes. That was an interesting change.

  • Recent Post