• MailChimp Widget

    GORDON AND THE WHALE NEWSLETTER



  • Review: TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN

    by:
    June 23rd, 2009

    transformers_revenge_of_the_fallen_ver2
    Rating 5/10

    Writers: Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
    Director: Michael Bay
    Cast: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, John Turturro, Ramon Rodriguez
    Studio: Paramount

    TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN is ridiculous, which doesn't make it automatically bad. You expect a fair amount of absurdity from a big budget summer movie based on a children's toy directed by Michael Bay, the man who gave us the unbelievable (but very enjoyable) summer movies THE ROCK and ARMAGEDDON. Two movies that are both a part of the prestigious Criterion Collection (technically not a sin, regardless of what some film fans think). With a movie like TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN, no strong sense of reality is needed, just blow shit up cool at a fast pace, give us some mildly interesting characters so we care a little bit about them when they're in danger (even though we have a good idea how it's going to turn out) and don't overdo the loud stuff to the point of redundancy. After that last sentence you probably see where I'm headed, especially if you saw my 5/10 rating. TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN is an undeservedly ultra-serious movie that features robotic human characters and plenty of loud action scenes that quickly begin to feel routine, and ultimately, becomes tragically boring by the time the final battle comes about.

    TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN has plenty of action sequences, but they are too similar to one another to keep the film interesting. This robot hits that robot. That robot hits that other robot with help from his friend. The main robot fatally hits the villain in Egypt. Nothing from the many robot fight scenes in REVENGE OF THE FALLEN stands out as inventive or memorable with REVENGE OF THE FALLEN's action quickly pushing past the point of exciting into annoying.

    Too many and too similar action sequences aren't the only reasons for the strong stale feeling that lingers throughout TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN's 147 minute running time. The running time alone is a major problem; a movie about transforming robots shouldn't be two and half hours long, there simply isn't enough there. Also, the second TRANSFORMERS has basically the same story as the first TRANSFORMERS film, with a few moderate, but not significant, changes. In TRANSFORMERS, Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf), along with his lady friend Mikaela (Megan Fox), the military, and the Autobots have to prevent the Decepticons from obtaining the Allspark, which has the ability to create and destroy life. The change with REVENGE OF THE FALLEN? The Decepticons are after Sam, instead of the Allspark, due to Sam gaining critical information from the powerful device. We've seen this all before and there isn't enough depth to a story like this to still be interesting on a second go-round.

    I tend to like the films of Michael Bay as highly-stylized unapologetic action movies that offer solid brainless entertainment, but with TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN, Michael Bay overdoes it, even for Michael Bay. I have considered the possibility that maybe I have changed, and maybe REVENGE OF THE FALLEN is on the same level with previous Bay films. However, I doubt this, as I recently watched my Criterion DVD of THE ROCK (yeah, that's right, I own it) and still loved the movie; and I also wrote this review moments after eating Fruity Pebbles while watching cartoons in self-made He-Man underwear, which makes the idea of me outgrowing Michael Bay very unlikely.

    Other articles that you might like:

    Commenting Rules: Comments are intended to open up the discussion to our readers about the topics at hand, and as such should be offered with a positive and constructive attitude. If your comment is not relative to the above post or is disrespectful to the authors and readers, we reserve the right to delete it. Continued abuse of our good nature will result in banishment of the offender. Additionally, if you have any burning issues to point out to the GATW crew - typos, corrections, suggestions, or straight-up criticism - please email us instead of commenting here.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Kacey3 Kacey3

      I will admit that I don't got to summer blockbusters for the original story or the quality acting. I go to summer blockbusters to be entertained. On that front, I was thoroughly entertained, though admittedly, I'm the exact target audience for this franchise. I'm a gamer, a geek, a gen X-er, and I was 13 when Transformers was on TV.

      I agree with several points made here about the lackluster acting and the canned story and action sequences, but the one thing that makes a summer blockbuster a success in my mind is "am I captivated." And I was. I found myself invested, emotionally in the movie. Yes, all the emotional segments were punctuated by cliche film effects, but I've argued the use of cliche techniques before ( http://bit.ly/18IST0 ).

      I wrote my own review on my blog that's not nearly as eloquent as Rusty's but it spells out my thought, never-the-less: http://kclose3.com/blog/2009/06/247

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/rustygordon rustygordon

        That's cool that it "captivated" you. I just couldn't get over the many flaws that I personally found with the film to enjoy it. I'm curious what exactly did you find captivating about the film? Maybe it will help me appreciate the film more.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/ChaseWhale ChaseWhale

          You sound like a robot with this message. <- strange since this film's about robots.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/KateErbland KateErbland

      James Wallace's Immediate Text Message Reviews (Patent Pending):
      "Yeah, it was the prime of all that is wrong in Hollywood. They couldn't even constructacon a good concepticon for the plot."
      "I really was hoping it was gonna bumblebee good. But it was SO bad I just wanted to starscream. And I'm known to have an ironhide when it comes to movies…I usually don't let stuff bother me this much and I always try to find the good in a film but there's just nothing about it that allsparked my interest enough to transform my thoughts on this film."

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/allisonloring allisonloring

        HI-larious. :)

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/RaziqBrown RaziqBrown

      Michael Bay makes things go BOOM!!!!

      And I love him for it, but, when I walked out of the theater at 2AM I wasn't too pleased.

      I couldn't understand why I didn't enjoy a movie which should've been a good turn-of-your-brain summer action flick.

      Was it way too long?

      Yes, but I enjoyed Watchmen more than this movie.

      Was it because the Robot fighting sequences became redundant and undistinguishable?

      I was expecting that when I walked in to the theater.

      Was it that I hard time believing Shia LeBouf could out run, or rather, out slide an army of intelligent, intergalactic, giant robots in the middle of the desert?

      I mean… it's a movie about giant robots that fight so I can't be too upset.

      Then I figured it out.

      Michael Bay wants to make Bad Boys 3 but couldn't so he made Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.

      If you think about it this movie succeeds where Bad Boys 2 succeeds and fails where Bad Boys 2 fails.

      In fact in Revenge of Fallen Michael Bay gives us a pretty good sign where the movie departs and becomes fairly boring via a Bad Boys 2 movie poster.

      The witty banter in the first 30 to 45 min of the movie which made Bad Boys 2 hilarious has audiences rolling in this movie but like all the good things it eventually comes to a very abrupt end.

      Like Bad Boys 2 once Sam Witwicky and crew leave the United States Revenge of the Fallen become horribly contrived, so much so, John Turturo turns to a giant robot and says the movie is becoming horribly contrived.

      "The Twins", two "urban" autobots who could've been Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, stop being a comedic duo and transform into a pair mechanized Jar Jar Binks.

      Sam Witwicky's newfound genius level intellect, as the main plot of the story, gets scrapped for a LOTR-esque quest for Optimus Prime's new battery.

      Bumblebee is no longer Sam's fun, lovable, pet golden camaro but rather a silent watchdog.

      And at some point Michael Bay stops the movie entirely to give the US Military a 10 minute long commercial.

      Transformers Revenge of the Fallen isn't the worst movie I've ever seen, but, I walked in with fairly low expectations and the movie barely met those standards.

      A 5 out of 10 is an accurate grade.

      Star Trek still wins.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/ChaseWhale ChaseWhale

        It's interesting you compare Revenge of the Fallen to Bad Boys 2. I can definitely see the similarities. It seems with both sequels Bay was trying to out do what he did with the originals. Only Bay already pushes the limit of over-the-top dramatic action with the original films that when he tries to do more with the sequels, the end result is just too much. Bad Boys 2 is my least favorite Bay film, but Revenge of the Fallen isn't that far behind.

        Just for fun, I will now rank Michael Bay's film, in order of best to work, for me personally:
        1. The Rock
        2. Bad Boys
        3. Transformers
        4. Armageddon
        5. The Island
        6. Pearl Harbor
        7. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
        8. Bay Boys II

        I consider the first four to be solid entertainment, the last 4 range from mediocre to painful.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/rustygordon rustygordon

        It's interesting you compare Revenge of the Fallen to Bad Boys 2. I can definitely see the similarities. It seems with both sequels Bay was trying to out do what he did with the originals. Only Bay already pushes the limit of over-the-top dramatic action with the original films that when he tries to do more with the sequels, the end result is just too much. Bad Boys 2 is my least favorite Bay film, but Revenge of the Fallen isn't that far behind.

        Just for fun, I will now rank Michael Bay's film, in order of best to work, for me personally:
        1. The Rock
        2. Bad Boys
        3. Transformers
        4. Armageddon
        5. The Island
        6. Pearl Harbor
        7. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
        8. Bay Boys II

        I consider the first four to be solid entertainment, the last 4 range from mediocre to painful.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/allisonloring allisonloring

      I have a kid in my office who does a mean impersonation of the more "ethnic" robots from this film… I sadly think his reenactment might be the best thing to come out of this movie. :(

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/cmcclelland32 cmcclelland32

      I agree with all. I was so excited about the new movie, and getting to see it at the preview was awesome (thank you gordon and the whale!). Unfortunately, I came out of it with the realization that I have seen all of Michael Bay's tricks, and they're becoming boring. Why does the camera have to be moving every frickin' second of a Bay movie? If it's motivated, great! If not, then do some OTS and reaction stuff, meaningful inserts. And yes, I understand it's an action movie. It's not Rear Window, for godsakes. Still, if I'd seen one more 360 camera dolly shot I think I would have puked, from seasickness if not from the lack of originality the shot now entails. I think the best think Mr. Bay could do right now would be watch a few classic movies and direct something so against his action movie boner that he could get a fresh perspective on the art form. Still, I'll probably see the movie again, for nothing else than Megan Fox on the motorcycle. Wow. Again I'll say…Wow…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/amasigh amasigh

      BEST transformers review i've read all summer – bravo!

  • Recent Post