Sundance 2010 Review: TWELVE

GATW Guest Writer

by: GATW Guest Writer
August 6th, 2010

This review was written on February 4th at the Sundance Film Festival.

Rating: 1.5/5

Writer: Jordan Melamed (screenplay), Nick McDonell (novel)
Director: Joel Schumacher
Cast: Chace Crawford, Rory Culkin, Ellen Barkin, Curtis '50 Cent' Jackson
Studio: Hannover House

Oh Joel, what are we going to do with you?

There are many disasters on Joel Schumacher's resume and in several different genres, including: musicals (THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA), supernatural thrillers (THE NUMBER 23), comic-book (the absolutely terrible BATMAN AND ROBIN), action thriller (THE BAD COMPANY) and many other misfires.  Unfortunately, the man does more bad than good as director, but he tries. Schumacher is really quite prolific, despite so many failures- both at the box-office and critically.

Schumacher's recent film BLOOD CREEK (also known as TOWN CREEK) came out last year, but it did not get a proper theatrical release since Lionsgate only released it to a few dollar theaters in certain markets. My market just happened to be one of the few that received BLOOD CREEK. The film is not awful, but there was not much to like about it.  A pretty basic, low-on-the-thrills horror film that (appropriately) came and went quietly.

Schumacher's latest film, TWELVE, is different in content and genre than BLOOD CREEK, but is not any better-it is actually worse. It sinks lower than mediocre into laughably bad territory with a hollow story about shallow, rich teenagers. At least the film's depth matches that of its characters, but that does not make anything notable or engaging.  With TWELVE there is very little to like, but there is plenty to make you roll your eyes and check your watch 12,1434 times.

TWELVE's title is a bit cryptic if you are not familiar with the film, several people asked me what the film is about after I had told them I saw the screening.  To avoid confusion, and to let everybody instantly know what to expect, they should change the name from TWELVE to Joel Schumacher's RICH KIDS.  That is what the film is, Schumacher making an empty story about rich kids, and one former rich kid who is now a drug dealer to his former friends and classmates, called White Mike.  His family lost their money when his mother fought and eventually died from breast cancer the year before.

There are many selfish characters in TWELVE, although I suppose White Mike (Chace Crawford) is not one of them, but there is not much depth for White Mike's character. We see him walk around with permanent beard scruff and a stoic expression, while dealing a lot of drugs.  Occasionally he thinks about his deceased mother, or tries to get a hold of his drug addict cousin Charlie (Jeremy Allen White), or his best friend Hunter (Philip Ettinger) who has been arrested for suspicion of murder.

Just from talking about those characters you can start to see how over-the-top dramatic everything is with TWELVE. There is also the smart, girl character, who get's hooked on a new, extremely potent and addicting drug, TWELVE (there is the title), and is willing to do anything for her next hit.  As well the shallow, beautiful girl who gets a catwalk on the street introduction, and seems to use every guy.  There are even more troubled characters than that, but you get the idea.  Plus, the intertwining stories are poorly-developed. TWELVE is like several lame, R-rated after-school specials crammed into one weak film.

TWELVE fails in more than just the story department. The acting is pretty terrible with a couple of the film's better performances actually achieving the realm of mediocre. The screenplay makes the characters uninteresting from the start, and the acting does not add anything to them. They are lifeless, one-dimensional characters that are too boring to even enjoy disliking.

TWELVE also features the overuse of a narrator.  Why even have dialogue if you are going to give most of the lines to the narrator?  Much of what the narrator says could be inferred or figured out if the film cared to try a little harder, but it does not, so we get a product that feels too much like a book on tape.

Before TWELVE played as the closing night film at Sundance,  Joel Schumacher gave an affectionate introduction to the film that made the director instantly endearing, it was clear that TWELVE meant a lot to Joel Schumacher.  Too bad he, or anybody else involved could not make the film mean anything to us. TWELVE will eventually be added to Schumacher's large failure pile.

Commenting Rules: Comments are intended to open up the discussion to our readers about the topics at hand, and as such should be offered with a positive and constructive attitude. If your comment is not relative to the above post or is disrespectful to the authors and readers, we reserve the right to delete it. Continued abuse of our good nature will result in banishment of the offender. Additionally, if you have any burning issues to point out to the GATW crew - typos, corrections, suggestions, or straight-up criticism - please email us instead of commenting here.

  • michaeltoussaint

    Wait a minute. In what universe was PHANTOM OF THE OPERA a “disaster”? That movie was a great interpretation of the source material and was by no measure a failure. This definitely questions your taste this one. Perhaps you're simply thinking of a different film.

  • RustyGordon

    No same film. I was referring to the fact that it did poor with the critics (33 % on Rottentomatoes) and missed making its budget back by about $20 million. I consider that a disaster, and yeah, I did not enjoy it. But, you disagree based on personal taste, and that is totally cool.

    By the way, I like that you did not take any personal attacks on me even though you disagreed with my statement. Thanks for the civility.

  • tinycatherine

    I think movies about rich kids who have drug problems is a challenge because the bar has been set pretty high with Less Than Zero.

  • michaeltoussaint

    hm. Well, I do suppose it's just a difference of taste. Perhaps I have a romantic bias toward the film. heh. Makes me think of good times.

    And I always aspire to civility. Not to mention that I've seen many of your reviews where I completely agreed. ;)

  • michaeltoussaint

    hm. Well, I do suppose it's just a difference of taste. Perhaps I have a romantic bias toward the film. heh. Makes me think of good times.

    And I always aspire to civility. Not to mention that I've seen many of your reviews where I completely agreed. ;)

  • Recent Post