I saw this film at Sundance and thought it was wonderful, as did the rest of the audience in attendance. As for the reviews, it is very faulty reporting on your part to say they were “less than stellar” – the truth is the reviews were very split. Yes, some early bloggers and Variety were unkind – that is true – but that must be balanced with none other than the New York Times, Paste Magazine, Mojo Magazine, and USA Today – all of which gave the film glowing praise. USA Today went so far as to write an article in defense of the film, citing the audience's overwhelming response, and questioning the veracity of the early negative reviews. I agree the poster is lackluster, but let's please be fair and honest in the reporting. Sympathy for Delicious has a growing fan base and enough positive reviews to make it worthy of a better discussion than this. Also, there are valid reasons the film has no distributor yet. Metropolitan made a generous offer to distribute, which Mr Ruffalo chose to turn down because of creative differences over the choice of music. There have also been offers from other distributors to put the film out in a platform release (4 to 8 theaters to start) which Mr Ruffalo has also chosen to pass on. Instead, he has been screening the film for select audiences and personally appearing afterward to do Q & A's to an overwhelming response – building awareness of the film and marketing it in a creative grass-roots way. The positive audience response at these events must count for something, so let's please not pass judgement until the film has had it's chance.

Whats up webmaster can I use a few of the info from this post if I supply a link back for your website?