Theatrical Review: WAITING FOR FOREVER

Kate Erbland

by: Kate Erbland
February 3rd, 2011

Rating: 1/5

Writer: Steve Adams
Director: James Keach
Cast: Rachel Bilson, Tom Sturridge, Richard Jenkins, Blythe Danner
Studio: Freestyle Releasing

Under the innocent guise of twee love story, James Keach’s WAITING FOR FOREVER achieves the nearly unthinkable – it makes “love” look equally as appealing as something more quantifiably “forever,” like life imprisonment, or hauling a boulder up a hill for eternity.

In the film, Tom Sturridge’s Will Donner has spent his entire young adult life obsessively pining for Rachel Bilson’s Emma. Friends since childhood, the two lost touch after Will and his brother Jim were orphaned in a freak train accident. Though Emma has moved on, Will has never forgotten her kindness in the wake of his loss, and though that may sound sweet, WAITING FOR FOREVER is about as sweet as a sauce pan filled with boiled bunnies.

The problem with films like WAITING FOR FOREVER is that love is not simply romanticized into something that most people will never experience – it’s turned into something no one would want to experience. Will is, quite literally, a hobo. A pajama-clad, train-jumping, ball-juggling vagrant whose living locations have been entirely determined by the movements of a girl who doesn’t even realize what he’s doing. Correct, Will has spent his late teens and early twenties following Emma around the country, without ever speaking to her. Surely the idea of an emotionally damaged hobo whose idea of professing love boils down to stalking isn’t appealing to most people, right? However, should this speak to you, hell, WAITING FOR FOREVER might be your new favorite film.

At the heart of WAITING FOR FOREVER’s latent awfulness is its very premise. Had Steve Adams’ script been trimmed down, cut to a story about a sad guy who never quite got over his first love, it may have been much more common, but it would have at least been palatable. As an actress, even Emma’s profession lends itself to distant observation – why couldn’t Will have lived his life, watching her on television, reminiscing over their childhood? Why did he have to creepily haunt her life for years on end, only to reveal himself back in their hometown, where he could have feasibly been waiting already? It could all be chalked up as being utterly ludicrous if it wasn’t also so phenomenally awful and bizarre.

It is also one of the ugliest films in recent memory – not just tonally and structurally, but also technically. Flashback sequences of the film are lensed to look like they’ve been put through some sort of Hipstamatic wringer, as if an iPhone had spit up what are supposed to be key sequences in our understanding of Will, Emma, and their bond. The rest of the film is equally as harsh to the eye – the sort of overblown and oversaturated wasteland that is to be expected from family films unearthed after years in an attic, not a professional motion picture.

WAITING FOR FOREVER attempts to find profundity by layering the nonsense – not content for Emma’s boyfriend Aaron (a disturbing Matthew Davis) to simply be wrong for Emma, he also has to harbor a dark secret that doesn’t reveal itself until late in the film, far past the time that anyone could reasonably be expected to care about its ramifications. Emma cannot simply be at home for a weekend – her father must be dying of cancer. As Richard Twist, veteran actor Richard Jenkins gets off with the only truly amusing lines of the entire film, but those have to happen while he’s looking utterly bewildered that he’s landed in such dreck and totally flummoxed by Blythe Danner’s performance as his wife, both unhinged and unsettling in what can only be regarded as a complete mistake.

Rachel Bilson does occasionally bring the only vestige of emotional truth to the entire project. When Will confesses just how he’s been living his life these many years, Bilson’s reaction is quite possibly the only understandable one in the film – she’s hurt and shocked and sad. It’s remarkable that WAITING FOR FOREVER doesn’t stoop to overwrought outbursts in this moment, instead letting Bilson use actual talent to convey something resembling a realistic response.

As a love story, WAITING FOR FOREVER is phenomenally creepy and often simply uncomfortable – a failure. As a film about mental illness, it’s a ham-fisted sham with no emotional sensitivity – again, a failure. It’s the sort of film that will make audiences wonder what film didn’t get made so that such an ugly, messy, horrible spectacle could be brought to their theaters instead.

Commenting Rules: Comments are intended to open up the discussion to our readers about the topics at hand, and as such should be offered with a positive and constructive attitude. If your comment is not relative to the above post or is disrespectful to the authors and readers, we reserve the right to delete it. Continued abuse of our good nature will result in banishment of the offender. Additionally, if you have any burning issues to point out to the GATW crew - typos, corrections, suggestions, or straight-up criticism - please email us instead of commenting here.

  • https://gordonandthewhale.com allisonloring

    I’m sorry – a movie about a stalker hobo? I can tell you right now there is a high chance this movie is going to shoot to my Top Ten list!

    • Anonymous

      When I first heard “juggling hobo” I immediately thought of you. Hobo love stories!

  • https://gordonandthewhale.com KateErbland

    What I did find disconcerting (not so much “threatening”) was that Will followed her around the country, for years, never talking to her. That’s not the same as hormone-filled tweens pining over a celebrity by salivating over videos or magazines. It’s a fundamentally creepy premise, it’s just not sweet to me. The film also seems completely unaware of the creepy factor, going so far as to make Will’s brother seem like the bad guy when he points out just how unstable Will’s behavior is. Is Will sincere? He seems totally sure of his feelings – is that sincerity? No, that’s mental illness, when every other person and every other sign points to his feelings being uniquely held by him.

  • https://gordonandthewhale.com KateErbland

    What I did find disconcerting (not so much “threatening”) was that Will followed her around the country, for years, never talking to her. That’s not the same as hormone-filled tweens pining over a celebrity by salivating over videos or magazines. It’s a fundamentally creepy premise, it’s just not sweet to me. The film also seems completely unaware of the creepy factor, going so far as to make Will’s brother seem like the bad guy when he points out just how unstable Will’s behavior is. Is Will sincere? He seems totally sure of his feelings – is that sincerity? No, that’s mental illness, when every other person and every other sign points to his feelings being uniquely held by him.

    • https://gordonandthewhale.com allisonloring

      Also – why is no one trying to HELP Will? He is clearly struggling with a mental illness and yet his two “friends” simply encourage his erratic behavior while his brother simply ignores it or tries to shame it out of him.

  • https://gordonandthewhale.com KateErbland

    At the very least, Will is deeply damaged by the loss of his parents (I don’t think that economics play a part in Will’s story – he seems perfectly finacially soluble and secure even while working as a street preformer). That’s hard to deny by anyone.

    My problem with THE FILM (which is what I am critiquing here) is that it doesn’t seem to understand WHAT it is presenting in terms of plot and character – it tries to make this seem like a charming love story when, in fact, I still find it unshakably creepy.

    I mention in my review that the story should have been trimmed down to make it work as a romantic film (what the film was clearly aiming for). In the other direction, if the film was aiming to be a serious look at mental illness (which, I maintain, it was not), it would have needed to expand on Will. Was PSYCHO aiming to be a serious and scary look at mental illness? Absolutely – which is why the film works.

    WAITING FOR FOREVER is a terrible film that has absolutely no bearings on any plot point or character it’s trying to present. It’s so incredibly tonedeaf that I can’t find a recent film to compare it to.

    Is Will sick? Certainly. Does the film try to make that charming, completely unaware of the implications of his illness? Yes. That’s why it’s not only BAD, it’s also insulting.

  • Ritter von Eyp

    Will’s obsession for Emma certainly isn’t in any of the character’s interest, including his own, but I don’t think that it’s sufficient to declare him mentally ill. I do, however, concede that Will is indeed creepy and that my argument opposing this view is wrong. What meaning does “creepy” have if embodied in such an almost ideally innocuous character as Will is? It has some meaning, because Will’s behaviour constitutes an intrusion into the life of somebody else, who, in any event, cannot be expected to dismiss Will as harmless. The audience knows better of course. Soon Emma must realise this too. It is in this light that the harshness meted out to the character of Will in the reviews remains puzzling in my opinion and it is this that prompted my first post, however crudely I may have put it. The reasons for the critics heavy-handed approach would make an interesting investigation; I have attempted to do so in my last post. Here is a related consideration: The dearth of absurd characters (like Will) in acting today warrants closer attention. This was not always the case. The vagabond for a long time had a place in acting. Will is both a vagabond in one sense and a pitiful man-child in another. Maybe the producers were trying to make some kind of statement and created an outrageous character in order to make sure it does not go down unheard? If so, then the audacity about the plot, reflected in the critics’ disgust, would ensure greater publicity and reception, than say, “Into The Wild”. On other hand, if the statement is about unrequited love, then this kind of movie would strike a nerve sharper than “500 Days Of Summer” which ends all too realistically. Will’s obsession for Emma certainly isn’t in any of the character’s interest, including his own, but I don’t think that it’s sufficient to declare him mentally ill. I do, however, concede that Will is indeed creepy and that my argument opposing this view is wrong. What meaning does “creepy” have if embodied in such an almost ideally innocuous character as Will is? It has some meaning, because Will’s behaviour constitutes an intrusion into the life of somebody else, who, in any event, cannot be expected to dismiss Will as harmless. The audience knows better of course. Soon Emma must realise this too. It is in this light that the harshness meted out to the character of Will in the reviews remains puzzling in my opinion and it is this that prompted my first post, however crudely I may have put it. The reasons for the critics heavy-handed approach would make an interesting investigation; I have attempted to do so in my last post. Here is a related consideration: The dearth of absurd characters (like Will) in acting today warrants closer attention. This was not always the case. The vagabond for a long time had a place in acting. Will is both a vagabond in one sense and a pitiful man-child in another. Maybe the producers were trying to make some kind of statement and created an outrageous character in order to make sure it does not go down unheard? If so, then the audacity about the plot, reflected in the critics’ disgust, would ensure greater publicity and reception, than say, “Into The Wild”. On other hand, if the statement is about unrequited love, then this kind of movie would strike a nerve sharper than “500 Days Of Summer” which ends all too realistically. Perhaps you are right when you say that the plot needed expanding, but that is often the case in experimental movies. It makes up for this with its subtleties and unpredictability. How bad can this movie be? It was screened repeatedly for a year to discerning audiences at art film festivals across America.

  • Recent Post